Skip to main content

Would You Rather Own a Diamond Ring or Ring Pop?

imgres-2.jpgWe commonly compare two similar companies, but what if we were to look at two polar opposites? Tiffany (TIF) and Dollar Tree (DLTR). Tiffany is a high-end jewelry company. They sell jewelry anywhere from $25 to $200,000. Now, Dollar Tree, that’s a different story. All their products are a dollar or less, selling anything from socks to pencils. Both companies are reasonably profitable, with margins over 25%. These companies sell to different consumers, and they are both targeting two different sides of the market.


Dollar Tree is trying to offer cheaply priced products for their customers and easy to reach with 13,600 stores in the U.S. and 226 stores in Canada. They are trying to expand in Canada to have 1,000 stores in total. This may be a problem, Dollarama is a large competitor in Canada. Dollarama already has over 1,000 stores developed in Canada. If Dollar Tree was to be successful enough and get past this competitor that would not be the end of their troubles. They bought their main U.S. competitor, Family Dollar. Just like in the U.S. they would have to deal with Target, Walmart and other businesses competing for the same target crowd. Dollar Tree has one thing to its advantage, all their products are a dollar. Family Dollar, which is like a CVS or Walgreens, without the drugs, but with 20% lower prices. Family Dollar is not as cheap as Dollar Tree but still reaches the “Cost Advantage” moat. Because of this, they can have two similar target markets. This makes Dollar Tree indestructible to a large competitor, Amazon.

Tiffany, on the other hand, is trying to maintain their high end, an expensive
reputation that they have maintained since 1837. Unlike most stores, Tiffany prides itself on their different type of layout. Instead of having the cheaper items in the front, drawing more customers in, they put their most expensive products up front to retain their lavish brand. Somewhat recently, Tiffany has raised their dividend by 11%. It went from the previous 45 cents to 50 cents per quarter. This is the 16th time in the last 15 years that it has been raised.

Now that we have established what the future holds for each company we have to choose, do we want a ring pop or an 18k gold, diamond ring? This is incredibly tricky to do, even just thinking about the analogy. Overall, Tiffany and Co’s stock has made more growth, at it’s highest point 90%. Whereas Dollar Tree’s 70%.
Screen Shot 2017-06-21 at 8.33.06 AM.png

Once, we have looked at their future and past, let’s compare their current position.

Companies
Price To Earnings
Dividend
Gross Margin
Return on Equity
Debt
Tiffany and Co
25.6
2.00%
62.4%
15.0%
0.3
Dollar Tree
18.9
---
30.9%
16.8%
1.1

Starting with the P/E Ratio, neither has a bad one. As I’ve mentioned before, it isn’t bad to pay a little more for a good company, but a higher P/E Ratio means fewer earnings for your investment dollar. Not having a dividend is not a total loss, but it’s nice to have. Comparing the numbers, Tiffany looks like a better candidate because their Margins are better, they have a Dividend and less Debt.  

Last, but not least, their moats. We are going to start with Dollar Tree. Dollar Tree has Cost Advantage. Looking at their name you can see that is the moat they pride themselves with and is most beneficial to their company. They also have Intangible Assets because of their brand. Those are both very powerful advantages. An easy way to tell if a moat is working is by the company’s Margins. Tiffany only has Intangible Assets, but that is extremely powerful in their case. Because of their brand, customers are willing to pay 30% more for their products because of their brand name. On the other side, Dollar Tree’s moat is Cost Advantage their Margins remain high, which is great. It also isn’t bad if the margins are low if the company can run and deal with supply and demand at low costs. If you ever need to check the success of a moat look at the Margins.


All in all, Tiffany has shown a stable past, good margins and numbers, reliable moats and a hopeful future. This should in no way change your opinion, there are different companies for different people. I believe both companies will be successful in the future but see Tiffany as a great company.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Monsoon Pabrai Prevailing with Force

Lighthouses in Monsoon’s Words “My lighthouse would be knowing when I am not happy, finding my purpose. When you are not having fun, something is wrong. My family is my lighthouse. They helped me to realize I was not happy and try something else.” Monsoon Pabrai, is like her name: she prevails with force. She was born into the world of finance. Her father, fund manager Mohnish Pabrai, tried to encourage Monsoon and her sister to be as fascinated with investing as he is. She graduated from the University of California Berkeley in 2017, but don’t let her short career fool you. Monsoon is the current marketing and community lead at Coral Labs, a start-up company. Prior to working at Coral Labs, she was an investment analyst intern at the UCLA Foundation and worked as a research analyst for Dalton Investments. During dinner, if her father was excited about a recent investment, he would break it down for Monsoon and her sister. She became curious and wanted to invest on her o...

The Bank that Stood the Test of Time and Tides

On December 26th, 1993, Robert Gaughen took over Hingham Institution for Savings as CEO during a tumultuous time for the bank. A former Hingham president was arrested on charges that the illegally approved loans costing the bank millions, and for which he allegedly received $240,000 in illegal payments.  The bank was also underperforming. Non-Performing Assets were $9.4 million in 1992, 6.2% of assets, which were quickly reduced by 90% to $0.9 million, 0.62% of assets, in 1994, and only continued to improve from there. Asset quality is critical to the survival of a bank, and along with these improvements, Hingham began paying a dividend in 1994.  *Source: Hingham Institution for Savings’s 1994 Annual Report  Over the next 26 years, the company’s loan quality improved, its branch network expanded outside of Hingham, Massachusetts, and Book Value per Share grew 14 times. The company’s share price has grown 15.6% per year (including dividends).  *Hingham Institution for...

What a Snowball Really Looks Like

I recently met an 89-year-old woman named Ginny. She has a passion for investing, math and numbers. We talked for three hours and I learned a few critical things. She taught me about successful simple companies, what it was like to be a woman investor in the 1960s, and what time can do for an investor. I hope you enjoy her story as much as I did. 1.Success with Simplicity Ginny lives in a small town in Minnesota and has been investing for many years. As a wedding gift from her father in law Ginny and her husband received shares of stock. She decided she had better learn about investing, that one gift fired her life long passion in investing. She slowly learned more and more until it became her main interests. Once she got started she never stopped.   While Ginny and her young family were on a road trip, they stopped for breakfast at a pancake diner.  Time and again on this trip they ran into the same chain. Each diner had one thing in common, they all had ov...